Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Шоу: 20 | 50 | 100
Результаты 1 - 3 de 3
Фильтр
Добавить фильтры

база данных
Годовой диапазон
1.
J Public Health Policy ; 43(2): 251-265, 2022 Jun.
Статья в английский | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1788357

Реферат

Global health crises require coordination and collaboration among actors and global health agendas including health security, health promotion, and universal health coverage. This study investigated whether national public health institutes (NPHIs) unify agendas and actors, how this can be achieved, and what factors contribute to success. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 24 public health leaders from 18 countries in six WHO regions between 2019 and 2020. Respondents described how NPHIs bridge agendas reporting five strategies that institutes employ: serving as a trusted scientific advisor; convening actors across and within sectors; prioritizing transdisciplinary approaches; integrating public health infrastructures, and training that builds public health capacity. Findings also revealed five enabling factors critical to success: a strong legal foundation; scientific independence; public trust and legitimacy; networks and partnerships at global, national, and local levels; and stable funding. The Covid-19 pandemic underscores the urgency of securing scientific independence and promoting national institutes' responsiveness to public health challenges.


Тема - темы
COVID-19 , Global Health , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Pandemics , Public Health , Public Health Administration
3.
pt ; 2020(Ambiente & Sociedade)
Статья в Marques Di Giulio Gabriela/0000-0003-1396-9788 | WHO COVID | ID: covidwho-665839

Реферат

Abstract Among the possible developments of the Covid-19 pandemic at the international and national levels is the advancement of the Global Health Security (GHS) agenda. On the one hand, GHS might be able to give priority to health problems on the political agenda-setting, on the other, however, it might open up space for public security actors in decision-making processes to the detriment of the power of health authorities. This article critically analyzes the concept and the progress of the GHS agenda seeking to demonstrate that there can be no security in matters of public health when sustainability in its multiple dimensions is not taken into account. At the end, sustainability has a twofold responsibility: to maintain the consistency and permanence of emergency response actions, especially with investments in public health systems, with universal access, and to minimize the structural causes of pandemics linked to the environment.

Критерии поиска